Han, Q., Guo, Q., Korpelainen, H., Niinemets, U. & ; Li, C. Rootstock determines the drought resistance of poplar grafting combinations. Tree Physiol. 39, 1855-1866 (2019).
Google Scholar
Pérez-Luna, A. et al. Grafting in conifers : a review. Pak. J. Bot. 52, 1369-1378 (2020).
Google Scholar
Larson, R. A. Grafting : a review of basics as well as special problems associated with conifer grafting. Comb. Proc. int. Plant Propag. Soc. 56, 318-322 (2006).
Google Scholar
Stull, G. W. et al. Gene duplications and phylogenomic conflict underlie major pulses of phenotypic evolution in gymnosperms. Nat. Plants 7, 1015-1025 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, H. T. et al. Origin of angiosperms and the puzzle of the Jurassic gap. Nat. Plants 5, 461-470 (2019).
Google Scholar
Pérez-Luna, A. et al. Some factors involved in the success of side veneer grafting of Pinus engelmannii Carr. Les forêts 10, 112 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cortizo, M. et al. Micrografting of mature stone pine (Pinus pinea L.). Ann. For. Sci. 61, 843-845 (2004).
Google Scholar
Mencuccini, M., Martínez-Vilalta, J., Hamid, H. A., Korakaki, E. & ; Vanderklein, D. Evidence for age- and size-mediated controls of tree growth from grafting studies. Tree Physiol. 27, 463-473 (2007).
Google Scholar
Jayawickrama, K., Jett, J. & ; McKeand, S. Rootstock effects in grafted conifers : a review. Nouveau pour. 5, 157-173 (1991).
Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, E. E. Plant grafting : new mechanisms, evolutionary implications. Front Plant Sci. 5, 1-9 (2014).
Google Scholar
Mudge, K., Janick, J., Scofield, S. & ; Goldschmidt, E. E. A History of Grafting. Horticultural reviews. 35, 437-493 (2009).
Google Scholar
Melnyk, C. W. Plant grafting : insights into tissue regeneration. Régénération. 4, 3-14 (2017).
Google Scholar
Moing, A., Salesses, G. & ; Saglio, P. Growth and the composition and transport of carbohydrate in compatible and incompatible peach/plum grafts. Tree Physiol. 3, 345-354 (1987).
Google Scholar
Notaguchi, M. et al. Cell-cell adhesion in plant grafting is facilitated by β-1, 4-glucanases. Science 369, 698-702 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kurotani, K. I. et al. Discovery of the interfamily grafting capacity of Petunia, a floricultural species. Hortic. Res. 9, uhab056 (2022).
Google Scholar
Reeves, G. et al. Monocotyledonous plants graft at the embryonic root-shoot interface. Nature 602, 280-286 (2022).
Google Scholar
Melnyk, C. W., Schuster, C., Leyser, O. & ; Meyerowitz, E. M. A developmental framework for graft formation and vascular reconnection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 25, 1306-1318 (2015).
Google Scholar
Fragoso, V., Goddard, H., Baldwin, I. T. & ; Kim, S.-G. Une méthode de microgreffage simple et efficace pour des cellules de l’épithélium transformées de manière stable. Nicotiana attenuata afin d’examiner la signalisation entre la pousse et la racine. Méthodes pour les plantes 7, 1-8 (2011).
Google Scholar
Turnbull, C. G., Booker, J. P. & ; Leyser, H. M. Micrografting techniques for testing long-distance signalling in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 32, 255-262 (2002).
Google Scholar
Lindsay, D., Yeoman, M. & ; Brown, R. An analysis of the development of the graft union in Lycopersicon esculentum. Ann. Bot. 38, 639-646 (1974).
Google Scholar
Moore, R. & ; Walker, D. B. Studies of vegetative compatibility-incompatibility in higher plants. I. Étude structurale d’une autogreffe compatible chez l’espèce Sedum telephoides (Crassulaceae). Am. J. Bot. 68, 820-830 (1981).
Google Scholar
Sala, K., Karcz, J., Rypień, A. & ; Kurczyńska, E. U. Unmethyl-esterified homogalacturonan and extensins seal Arabidopsis l’union des greffons. BMC Plant Biol. 19, 1-16 (2019).
Google Scholar
Melnyk, C. W. et al. Transcriptome dynamics at Arabidopsis Les jonctions entre greffons révèlent un mécanisme de reconnaissance intertissulaire qui active la régénération vasculaire. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E2447-E2456 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhang, A. et al. Cell-wall damage activates DOF transcription factors to promote wound healing and tissue regeneration in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 32, 1883-1894 e7 (2022).
Google Scholar
Canher, B. et al. The regeneration factors ERF114 and ERF115 regulate auxin-mediated lateral root development in response to mechanical cues. Mol. Plant 15, 1543-1557 (2022).
Google Scholar
Heyman, J. et al. The heterodimeric transcription factor complex ERF115-PAT1 grants regeneration competence. Nat. Plants 2, 16165 (2016).
Google Scholar
Iwase, A. et al. WIND transcription factors orchestrate wound-induced callus formation, vascular reconnection and defense response in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 232, 734-752 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bisht, A. et al. PAT1-type GRAS-domain proteins control regeneration by activating DOF3.4 to drive cell proliferation in Arabidopsis racines. Plant Cell 35, 1513-1531 (2023).
Google Scholar
Canher, B. et al. Rocks in the auxin stream : wound-induced auxin accumulation and ERF115 expression synergistically drive stem cell regeneration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 16667-16677 (2020).
Google Scholar
Matsuoka, K. et al. Differential cellular control by cotyledon-derived phytohormones involved in graft reunion of hypocotyles d’Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 57, 2620-2631 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ikeuchi, M. et al. Wound-inducible WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX 13 is required for callus growth and organ reconnection. Plant Physiol. 188, 425-441 (2022).
Google Scholar
Iwase, A. et al. The AP2/ERF transcription factor WIND1 controls cell dedifferentiation in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 21, 508-514 (2011).
Google Scholar
Pina, A. & ; Errea, P. A review of new advances in mechanism of graft compatibility-incompatibility. Sci. Hortic. 106, 1-11 (2005).
Google Scholar
Ran, J. H., Shen, T. T., Wu, H., Gong, X. & ; Wang, X. Q. Phylogeny and evolutionary history of Pinaceae updated by transcriptomic analysis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 129, 106-116 (2018).
Google Scholar
Thomas, H., Van den Broeck, L., Spurney, R., Sozzani, R. & ; Frank, M. Gene regulatory networks for compatible versus incompatible grafts identify a role for SlWOX4 during junction formation. Plant Cell 34, 535-556 (2022).
Google Scholar
Aloni, R., Aloni, E., Langhans, M. & ; Ullrich, C. Role of cytokinin and auxin in shaping root architecture : regulating vascular differentiation, lateral root initiation, root apical dominance and root gravitropism. Ann. Bot. 97, 883-893 (2006).
Google Scholar
Aloni, R. L’induction des tissus vasculaires par l’auxine et la cytokinine. Hormones végétales 531-546 (1995).
Kawakatsu, Y., Sawai, Y., Kurotani, K.-I., Shiratake, K. & ; Notaguchi, M. An in vitro grafting method to quantify mechanical forces of adhering tissues. Plant Biotechnol. 37, 451-458 (2020).
Google Scholar
Melnyk, C. W. & ; Meyerowitz, E. M. Plant grafting. Curr. Biol. 25, R183-R188 (2015).
Google Scholar
Rouphael, Y., Schwarz, D., Krumbein, A. & ; Colla, G. Impact of grafting on product quality of fruit vegetables. Sci. Hortic. 127, 172-179 (2010).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. Q. & ; Ran, J. H. Evolution and biogeography of gymnosperms. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 75, 24-40 (2014).
Google Scholar
Andrews, P. K. & ; Marquez, C. S. Graft incompatibility. Hortic. Rev. 15, 183-232 (2010).
Google Scholar
Lohar, D. P. & ; VandenBosch, K. A. Grafting between model legumes demonstrates roles for roots and shoots in determining nodule type and host/rhizobia specificity. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 1643-1650 (2005).
Google Scholar
Cookson, S. J. et al. Graft union formation in grapevine induces transcriptional changes related to cell wall modification, wounding, hormone signalling, and secondary metabolism. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 2997-3008 (2013).
Google Scholar
Cui, Q., Xie, L., Dong, C., Gao, L. & ; Shang, Q. Stage-specific events in tomato graft formation and the regulatory effects of auxin and cytokinin. Plant Sci. 304, 110803 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sundström, J. et al. MADS-box genes active in developing pollen cones of Norway spruce (Picea abies) sont homologues aux gènes homéotiques floraux de classe B chez les angiospermes. Dev. Genet. 25, 253-266 (1999).
Google Scholar
Tandre, K., Svenson, M., Svensson, M. E. & ; Engström, P. Conservation of gene structure and activity in the regulation of reproductive organ development of conifers and angiosperms. Plant J. 15, 615-623 (1998).
Google Scholar
Ma, H. S., Liang, D., Shuai, P., Xia, X. L. & ; Yin, W. L. La protéine GRAS SCL7 du peuplier, inductible au sel et à la sécheresse, confère la tolérance au sel et à la sécheresse chez les plantes. Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 4011-4019 (2010).
Google Scholar
Mouradov, A. et al. NEEDLY, a Pinus radiata orthologue des gènes FLORICAULA/LEAFY, exprimé dans les méristèmes reproducteurs et végétatifs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6537-6542 (1998).
Google Scholar
Sundås-Larsson, A., Svenson, M., Liao, H. & ; Engström, P. A homeobox gene with potential developmental control function in the meristem of the conifer Picea abies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 15118-15122 (1998).
Google Scholar
Rutledge, R. et al. Characterization of an AGAMOUS homologue from the conifer black spruce (Picea mariana) qui produit des conversions homéotiques florales lorsqu’elle est exprimée dans l’environnement de l Arabidopsis. Plant J. 15, 625-634 (1998).
Google Scholar
Azevedo, H., Lino-Neto, T. & ; Tavares, R. M. An improved method for high-quality RNA isolation from needles of adult maritime pine trees. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 21, 333-338 (2003).
Google Scholar
Siligato, R. et al. MultiSite Gateway-compatible cell type-specific gene-inducible system for plants. Plant Physiol. 170, 627-641 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kalmbach, L. et al. Putative pectate lyase PLL12 and callose deposition through polar CALS7 are necessary for long-distance phloem transport in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 33, 926–939.e9 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ursache, R., Andersen, T. G., Marhavy, P. & ; Geldner, N. A protocol for combining fluorescent proteins with histological stains for diverse cell wall components. Plant J. 93, 399-412 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mähönen, A. P. et al. A novel two-component hybrid molecule regulates vascular morphogenesis of the Arabidopsis racine. Genes Dev. 14, 2938-2943 (2000).
Google Scholar
Nisar, N., Verma, S., Pogson, B. J. & ; Cazzonelli, C. I. Inflorescence stem grafting made easy in Arabidopsis. Méthodes pour les plantes 8, 1-9 (2012).
Google Scholar
Matsuoka, K. et al. Wound-inducible ANAC071 and ANAC096 transcription factors promote cambial cell formation in incised Arabidopsis tiges fleuries. Commun. Biol. 4, 369 (2021).
Google Scholar
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji : an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676-682 (2012).
Google Scholar
Delhomme, N. et al. Guidelines for RNA-seq data analysis. Epigenesys Protoc. 67, 1-24 (2014).
Google Scholar
Kopylova, E., Noé, L. & ; Touzet, H. SortMeRNA : fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data. Bioinformatique 28, 3211-3217 (2012).
Google Scholar
Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & ; Gu, J. fastp : an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatique 34, i884-i890 (2018).
Google Scholar
Dobin, A. et al. STAR : ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatique 29, 15-21 (2013).
Google Scholar
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & ; Huber, W. HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatique 31, 166-169 (2015).
Google Scholar
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & ; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 1-21 (2014).
Google Scholar
Kumar, L. & ; Futschik, M. E. Mfuzz : a software package for soft clustering of microarray data. Bioinformation 2, 5 (2007).
Google Scholar
Langfelder, P. & ; Horvath, S. WGCNA : an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 9, 1-13 (2008).
Google Scholar
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape : a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498-2504 (2003).
Google Scholar
Tamura, K., Stecher, G. & ; Kumar, S. MEGA11 : molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 3022-3027 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chen, C. et al. TBtools : an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 13, 1194-1202 (2020).
Google Scholar
